Introduction
"Dear
Disabled Employee"
"Dear
Disabled Employee" II
Background
The "transition obligation"
Plan Details
The
Disclaimer
Conclusion
Links and Actions
(coming soon)
|
The
"transition obligation"
In the 1990's Digital made major changes to its disability
benefit plans. Employees already on disability were prohibited from accessing
these new plans which is consistent with the written documentation. At
the same time, such employees were explicitly referred to their existing
plan documentation.
Digital not only recognized its obligation but, in
fiscal 1994, took a 71 million dollar charge against income specifically
representing this "transition obligation".
The reader is encouraged to consider the use of the
word "obligation" and that this "obligation" was use
for tax purposes.
From Digital's 1996 annual report, note_g:
|
|
|
Postemployment benefits In the fourth quarter of
fiscal 1994, the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS)No. 112 - Employers' Accounting for Postemployment
Benefits, effective as of the beginning of the fiscal year. This
standard requires the accrual of benefits provided to former or
inactive employees, after employment but before retirement. These
benefits include, but are not limited to, salary continuation, supplemental
unemployment benefits, severance benefits, disability-related benefits
and continuation of benefits such as health care and life insurance
coverage.
The cumulative effect of adopting this standard resulted in a
one-time charge to income of $71,068,000 (the "transition obligation"),
or $.51 per common share. This transition obligation represents
principally the cost of providing medical, dental and life insurance
benefits to individuals in the U.S. currently on long-term disability,
during the estimated remaining period in which they will receive
disability benefits. The annual expense under the standard, exclusive
of the transition obligation, is not significantly different than
the annual expense under the Corporation's former practice. There
was no cash flow impact from the adoption of SFAS No. 112.
|
|
Click
for Digital's 1996 annual report, note_g
Plan
Details
Comments, corrections or additions may be
sent to webmaster
|